Sermon – July 19, 2009
Sermon for Sunday, July 19 , 2009 First Baptist Church of Lewisburg
Did I Speak?
2 Samuel 7: 1-14a; Ephesians 2: 11-22; Mark 6: 30-44
At one time the tourist guide book for cities in northern France mentioned, with regard to
the city of Beauvais, only the cathedral. The cathedral, it said, was ” a monument to pride, folly,
miscalculation, and collapse.” Evidently the architects of Beauvais, in their desire to outdo
Paris, made the roof of their building unusually high and then tried to top it with a spire. It didn’t
work. The spire fell, the roof beneath it collapsed, and a couple more tries only succeeded in
putting a roof back on. Reaching higher had to be abandoned.
William Golding, author of Lord of the Flies, specialized in novels of ideas for the
general reader and wrote a book about Beauvais called The Spire. In the book the local
bishop is pressing forward with the work, certain that God has affirmed his vision of a towering
place of worship, heedless of both the human and engineering failures surrounding
construction. At the end of the book an older clergyman explains to him what went wrong.
The Beauvais bishop, it turns out, was just a novice priest when he had been
accelerated through the ranks of church leadership by the string-pulling of an influential patron,
so that he had arrived at his position of power with relatively little experience of life as a leader
on behalf of God. The wise old associate who’d witnessed the whole thing said that it wasn’t
his fault but that he wasn’t seasoned enough in prayer, and so mistook a transport of
excitement in his praying about the cathedral for a signal from the Almighty. Human weakness,
both in desires and perceptions, had interfered with the prayer which had become the basis
for his vision of what God wanted built. If, before being faced with prayer about the cathedral,
he had spent more time with God, he would have learned to gauge the importance of his own
feelings and reactions and recognize how much of his experience of prayer was due to his
own personal needs and hopes and which things more likely were messages from God.
Our Old Testament lesson has a similar story from the life of King David, except in this
case God alerts the prophet Nathan to the misconception and David doesn’t try to build a
temple in Jerusalem. This is a useful story for us, because it reminds us that we can feel like
there’s something we should do as an expression of our love for God and our desire to serve
God, which God would rather we didn’t do.
That seems pretty terrible, because how often do we get motivated to do something
just for God anyway? Sometimes we serve God because something comes up, like the
need to forgive someone, and we are reminded that God wants us to forgive, so we end up
serving God because events require it of us. But how often do we just think, “you know what?
I want to do something for God, and so I’m going to do this.” If we get that far in our devotion
to the Almighty, shouldn’t that be enough? Do we really have to deal with the possibility that
our idea of what God wants us to do might not be God’s idea?
It’s painful, and it’s discouraging, to get interested in doing something to please another
and have it turn out to be the wrong thing. We’ve all gotten gifts for other people that just
struck us as something that other person really would like and learned, even when others have
done their best to reassure us, that the gifts were duds. Then what do we say? We say,
“Just tell me what you want.”
That’s the right approach with God, too, but it is not as straightforward as we’d like. In
David’s case, David nurses this notion he should build a temple but first consults God’s
prophet. He’s being prudent, not rushing in where angels fear to tread. What does Nathan tell
him? Nathan says it’s a great idea. Nathan, who is being trusted to have the word from God,
and who obviously trusts himself as a spokesperson for what God wants, tells David to follow
his bliss. Go right ahead, do what’s on your heart, Nathan says, and David leaves their
conversation feeling the way is clear.
Then God comes to Nathan in a dream, and says no. David shouldn’t build me a
temple. I don’t want David to build me a temple. I like things the way they are. And it’s not
just a “no thanks.” It’s more like, “who does David think he is? Have I asked for a temple?
Who’s in charge here?”
It’s almost enough to make a person give up. Sometimes people do give up. There
must be examples of that in scripture but I know there are examples in church life. People
heed a call, folks put themselves on the line to do something to contribute to the mission of
their local church, and it’s not welcome. It doesn’t turn out the way they hope. They invest a lot
and get a little return, or they try hard and only hear criticism, or any number of things which are
a lot like this: like feeling God wants you to do something and then getting the message that it
wasn’t such a great idea. Now sometimes that’s the fault of your fellow human beings.
People can be ungrateful, shortsighted, and all that. Sometimes it’s just the fact that we all get
lots of chances in life to look back and say, “It seemed like a good idea at the time.”
There’s not just a caution in the story of David’s feeling he should build a temple.
There’s also hope. A clear message from God comes through despite everything–despite
David’s convincing arguments to himself about the soundness of his aim and despite the
official spokesperson’s initially uninformed instincts. The prophet has been consulted, after all,
and there’s a chance for God to give guidance, and the prophet is enough of a prophet to
have the dream and remember what it means.
Well, that’s encouraging, but how many of us are experienced prophets, with a history
of being given something to say by God? We can find a closer comparison with ourselves in
the story of the miraculous feeding of over five thousand people, because in that story there’s
Jesus’ original disciples.
I call them “Jesus’ original disciples” because there have been plenty since, including
us, and what the New Testament shows us plainly about Peter, James, John and the rest is
that they don’t do as well as they should. They aren’t the toughest role models to follow. Of
course they all become champions of the faith and heroic martyrs and get churches named
after them ever after, but in the gospels, while they’re following Jesus, they’re making the sorts
of mistakes that we would make.
Where they go wrong in today’s gospel story is they know what Jesus wants before
they get there. I’m not being sarcastic, they do know what he wants. They had all been on the
other side of the water working long hours and Jesus had invited them to join him in going
some place where absolutely no demands would be placed on them and they could relax.
Of course, when they get to the other side, all these people had hurried ahead on foot
and are there waiting to get more of what Jesus has to give, so Jesus does. But all is not lost.
It’s getting late, and everybody has to eat, so the disciples know how they’re going to help
Jesus finally get the break he was seeking when they put off from shore long before. They
have a solution. The people going to be sent into surrounding villages to buy dinner for
themselves, and that’s going to get rid of this crowd so that what Jesus wants to happen at last
can happen. They don’t come to ask Jesus if this is a good plan. They are so confident it’s
the only way to go that they take advantage of the fact that Jesus has everyone’s ear to tell
him to send them off to get supper for themselves. It’s like he’s the guy who’s accustomed to
speaking in a loud voice so they ask him to make the announcement.
Well, we know what happens. When Jesus was leaving people behind he was
thinking about rest for himself and his disciples, but now that Jesus has people in front of him
he’s thinking about something for everybody that’s there. Things aren’t the same. Jesus’
nature to serve the needs of other people is engaged by the new reality.
Boy, that’s hard, too, if changing circumstances are going to change what disciples
should do. It goes hard on the disciples, too. Jesus tells them to feed the people and all they
can do is think of their own resources and say it’s impossible. Can’t do it, they say. They don’t
consider Jesus’ resources.
Jesus is there to tell them what should happen, and to make it happen. Their plan is
discarded in favor of his plan because he speaks up and gives them a new direction. How
come? Well, they do give him the opportunity. When they share what they have in mind
with Christ, there’s the possibility of dialogue and communication.
Several of us went to a workshop this spring about churches doing a really good job of
serving their community and serving Christ. All kinds of churches, with all kinds of emphases
and programs, were given as examples. What’s the one thing they had in common? They all
had spent a lot of time praying hard for guidance about what God wanted them to do. They’d
prayed seriously enough and for long enough that it became clear to them that God had a
purpose for them, whatever options they themselves had conceived. They’d been enough
in earnest that when doors started opening and opportunities began arriving they believed it
was answered prayer, and they responded to it as answered prayer.
Our church needs to pray the same prayer. To continue to be true to ourselves–to our
calling as disciples–through the changes that life always brings, we all need to pray that God
guide us, that our common effort be in response to a sense of God’s leading and with a
conviction of divine assistance and encouragement. Pray that God help us know what is the
work of this church, and don’t rush the answer. Today’s scriptures show us that human desire to
do may go wrong, but God will answer that desire with a way which is good.
